The Anti-Reactionary FAQ

Scott Alexander’s Anti-Reactionary FAQ — which, by actually attempting a serious critique of neoreaction, distinguishes itself from the usual point-and-sputter responses and cries of ‘Racist!’ — deserves, and has begun to get, some thoughtful replies from reactionary bloggers. Nick Steves of The Reactivity Place has aggregated some links, here, and Scharlach, of Habitable Worlds, has responded also, here.

A particularly focused response came from Michael Anissimov, here, in which he addresses Scott Alexander’s depiction of the Austrian monarchy as unstable. See also his preliminary response, here.

Visitors are invited to post additional links in the comment thread. Mr. Alexander’s post is substantial enough that it behooves us to collect our responses somewhere for the benefit of curious readers.


  1. I needed to put you that very small note to finally say thank you the moment again for the pretty guidelines you’ve contributed in this article. It has been simply surprisingly generous of you to offer publicly precisely what many individuals could have supplied for an electronic book to generate some dough on their own, primarily since you could possibly have done it if you decided. These tactics also worked to be a easy way to be certain that other individuals have similar desire much like my own to know very much more on the subject of this matter. I’m sure there are lots of more enjoyable instances ahead for many who view your site.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>